Possible bug/issue...?

[Frenchfry]

I'm sure you've probably thought of this by now, but there is a problem that just occured to me with the entire mmorpg thing with a pokemon map format.
This might have been asked before, but I used the search bar twice and nothing came up, so...
So, the problem I see is this: Can two avatars be on the same square? Because if not, then if two players didn't like another player for whatever reason, then they could just wait for him to go to walk through a twoo-square-wide pathway, and they could both stand next to eachother in the path, blocking him and keeping him from leaving the town. Or, two people could stand in the same spot, but they just happen to be afk, and  nobody could leave the town.
By the same token, if two avatars CAN be on the same square, than if everyone's talking in the center of a poular town or whatever, people could annoy other players by standing on the same square as them.
So, I want to know if the PU team has any plan to solve this problem.

[Seveer]

I think this is good ? but does it really matter if 2 people are on the same square. But ive seen a few youtube videos made by Spirit and I think the moving system is diffent, as in U press up U move up (you used to look up or turn).

[Raikt]

Characters can walk through each other, yes.

[Dvys]

Ever played a MMORPG?
You can always walk through other players and there aren't any problems with that ^^

[Jerry]

Yes, the link to the thread concerning this issue is here.

[Frenchfry]

Ever played a MMORPG?
You can always walk through other players and there aren't any problems with that ^^

Yes, I've played several. The only thing is, none of them were based on an existing video game. Especially one with the tile concept of the pokemon series. It just confused me.

Yes, the link to the thread concerning this issue is here.

Uh... I dunno. I used the search bar... *Throws smoke ball on ground and disssapears*

[Jerry]

Yes, I know, I tried too... I don't know if it's a search bar issue or not... I personally preferred the one before the present one.