* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

Anyone still around? by Bing
[October 28, 2024, 11:23:32 PM]


2023 Check in by Gawerty
[March 28, 2023, 12:41:12 AM]


Holy crap my login worked. by Ez
[December 03, 2020, 08:56:26 AM]


Been a while. by Bing
[July 13, 2019, 04:47:06 AM]


Was Feeling Nostalgic (Pokemon Knights) by Monzta
[October 24, 2018, 07:37:00 AM]


Old Habits Die Hard by Miss Wednesday
[January 23, 2018, 12:35:35 AM]


WHY IS EVERYONE MISSING by Tickles
[September 16, 2017, 08:20:25 PM]


Been a long time. by Monzta
[August 27, 2017, 03:18:58 PM]


Author Topic: do you always let your pokemon evolve?  (Read 83724 times)

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #60 on: July 07, 2010, 05:44:38 PM »
I never evolved Grovyle in ruby version, because Sceptile just looks gross, and everyone knows that Grovyle is a long-legged mac-daddy. I also sorely regret letting turtwig evolve at all in Pearl. Torterra is like someone took venasuar and turned him into a tree. it looks less flowery and more tree-like. Normally this is a good thing, but not when dealing with venasuar. I later turned my starter into an HM slave because he looked, as Stephenkill would say, 'gaytarded'.

Offline Jerry

  • Global Moderator
  • Elite Trainer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2.737
  • Karma: 16
  • Busy busy busy again
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #61 on: July 07, 2010, 07:24:32 PM »
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
« Last Edit: July 07, 2010, 07:29:59 PM by Jerry »
No one can go back and change a bad beginning; but anyone can start now and create a successful ending.
If a problem can be solved, no need to worry about it. If it cannot be solved what is the use of worrying?

Currently playing Pokemon XY/ORAS/Shuffle and Clash of Clans and testing out PokemonRevolutionOnline and Dragonmon Hunter....
Also, forum notification emails are not getting in my inbox... again...

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #62 on: July 07, 2010, 07:40:07 PM »
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
Funny you say that, because I actually hated marshtop. When I heard that every1 lieks mudkipz, I decided to try a playthrough in ruby with him as my starter. In a fantastic Blond moment, I got lost in rout whatever, just above oldale city. I spend about two hours there grinding while looking for a way to the next town, and my mudkipz evolves. I was all like, "eeeeewwww....", which is when I proceeded to find the path to the next town. I hated my starter pokemon until he evolved again, which is when I decided to nickname him, because his name wasn't manly enough for that level of awesomeness.

Offline LeoReborn

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.079
  • Karma: 0
  • Through the pain, I've been reborn.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #63 on: July 07, 2010, 08:27:30 PM »
I tend to like the 2nd form appearance of most Pokémon that have 3 stages. Like Bayleef, Haunter, these two are the only ones I'm thinking of right now cause I'm lazy, and I usually don't evolve them until like lvl. 50-60.
Me do too! Some pokemon just sometimes get a drop in appearance appeal when they get to their last evolution...



Best example of that is Mudkip. (How convinent....)

Nah, you missed my point. Marshtomp it the one I'm talking about. In the case you're wondering, my fav is Marshtomp, not Mudkip. I have this avy until I have an idea for an animated Marshtomp... If I could make it do the move Hydro Pump it would be nice!
Funny you say that, because I actually hated marshtop. When I heard that every1 lieks mudkipz, I decided to try a playthrough in ruby with him as my starter. In a fantastic Blond moment, I got lost in rout whatever, just above oldale city. I spend about two hours there grinding while looking for a way to the next town, and my mudkipz evolves. I was all like, "eeeeewwww....", which is when I proceeded to find the path to the next town. I hated my starter pokemon until he evolved again, which is when I decided to nickname him, because his name wasn't manly enough for that level of awesomeness.

When I was Talking About Mudkips, they Start of Cute, and get less and less so as they evolve. I said, "How convenient" because everybody on here Lieks Mudkips so much. (Especially Kamaran and Hitey.)
By loving so many, I have touched their lives and helped them rebirth as well. To be strong is to instill strength in another.

Offline DanyTbb

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #64 on: July 29, 2010, 10:10:13 PM »
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Offline valmaremoslayer

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #65 on: July 30, 2010, 01:03:26 AM »
I usually let them evolve, but if they stop learning moves then I will wait.

Offline Passive

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: 0
  • just listen // and watch the sky
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #66 on: July 30, 2010, 02:52:49 AM »
Eevee is too cute to evolve!

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #67 on: July 30, 2010, 06:33:42 AM »
Eevee is too cute to evolve!
Well, if it's cute you're going for, stick with mudkipz, plusle-minun, pichu, and phione.
-wait.. Phione isn't a legendary, right? Because... there's a bunch of them, and they have lame-o stats
Hate it. I dare you. I double dare you. Hate that face, and I will kill you.

Offline valmaremoslayer

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #68 on: July 30, 2010, 09:51:55 PM »
Eevee is too cute to evolve!
Well, if it's cute you're going for, stick with mudkipz, plusle-minun, pichu, and phione.
-wait.. Phione isn't a legendary, right? Because... there's a bunch of them, and they have lame-o stats
Hate it. I dare you. I double dare you. Hate that face, and I will kill you.

Well because Eevee is awesome and you usually only get one a game! (It's my favorite too and it's evolutions)

Offline Chad29

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 511
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #69 on: July 31, 2010, 01:07:22 AM »
Back when I was stingier with my TMs I would wait for certain pokemon to evolve. However I've found it easier to just let them evolve and use TMs on my main pokemon.

Offline Hova

  • Beginning Trainer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #70 on: July 31, 2010, 03:42:30 AM »
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #71 on: July 31, 2010, 04:19:20 AM »
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.

Offline Monzta

  • CharlesedickNB
  • Administrator
  • Good Trainer
  • ********
  • Posts: 691
  • Karma: 70
  • Effectively.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #72 on: July 31, 2010, 04:40:21 AM »
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.
...Sceptile.

Offline Frenchfry

  • Good Trainer
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.146
  • Karma: 0
  • I woke up with a clown's hand in my pants.
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #73 on: July 31, 2010, 04:16:53 PM »
I let it evolve...becauz much stronnger..>.> n looks better

Same here thy're a lot cooler when they evolve.
...Marshtop.
...Sceptile.
That too.

Offline Twisted Sword

  • New Trainer
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: 0
  • You ALL still have Zoidberg!
    • View Profile
Re: do you always let your pokemon evolve?
« Reply #74 on: August 10, 2010, 10:27:46 AM »
Always. They look cooler when they evolve and they're stronger. Everyone always says "If you make them evolve later, they'll be even stronger." Screw them. I don't have the freaking patience.